The details, side by side

Compare on the same terms.

Choose up to four providers from the same category. See what is documented, what comes with conditions and what is still missing.

Funded trading

Your comparison selection

2 of 4 selected

Earn2Trade

Replace provider

Replace Earn2Trade

TradeDay

Replace provider

Replace TradeDay

Add a provider to compareDifferences onlyBack to all providers

Comparing 2 providers in Funded trading

Some programs use simulated trading. Paying an evaluation fee does not guarantee funding or a payout.

Terms used in this table

Loss limit: how much may be lost in a day or overall before the account fails.
Withdrawal fee: what the exchange charges to send coins out; the network fee is separate.

Costs and terms
What to compare	Earn2TradeFull review → Visit Earn2Trade · Opens in a new tab	TradeDayFull review → Visit TradeDay · Opens in a new tab Coupon code at checkout

Service type	Funded trading	Funded trading
Legal entity and jurisdiction	Earn2Trade, LLC · United States — root-site terms / Bahia Education Services L.L.C · United Arab Emirates — Non-US education and regional reseller terms	TradeDay LLC · Illinois, United States

Evaluation stages	1	1

Drawdown method	Trailing	Trailing

Payout conditions	The split depends on single-withdrawal size and account tier; LiveSim ceilings are cumulative and Live progression is conditional.	Quick Pay and Fast Pass differ in splits, consistency, days, caps and the floor after payouts. Live is a separate conditional stage.

Trading restrictions	Session, loss, contract-ladder, copying and instrument restrictions vary by programme and stage.	Close positions and orders before the daily close; news, contract and product limits depend on stage.

Service model	Futures trading evaluation The evaluation is simulated; passing may lead to a simulated LiveSim or Live offer subject to the partner and review.	Futures trading evaluation Evaluation and Funded Sim are simulated; progression to Funded Live is separate and conditional.
TCP25 starting monthly price	150 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 25,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
TCP25 evaluation profit target	1,750 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
TCP25 EOD drawdown distance	1,500 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
TCP25 maximum daily loss	550 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
TCP25 contract ceiling	3 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
TCP50 starting monthly price	190 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 50,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
TCP50 evaluation profit target	3,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
TCP50 EOD drawdown distance	2,000 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
TCP50 maximum daily loss	1,100 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
TCP50 contract ceiling	6 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
TCP100 starting monthly price	350 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 100,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
TCP100 evaluation profit target	6,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
TCP100 EOD drawdown distance	3,500 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
TCP100 maximum daily loss	2,200 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
TCP100 contract ceiling	12 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
GAU50 starting monthly price	170 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 50,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
GAU50 evaluation profit target	3,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
GAU50 EOD drawdown distance	2,000 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
GAU50 maximum daily loss	1,100 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
GAU50 contract ceiling	6 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
GAU100 starting monthly price	315 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 100,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
GAU100 evaluation profit target	6,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
GAU100 EOD drawdown distance	3,500 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
GAU100 maximum daily loss	2,200 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
GAU100 contract ceiling	12 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
GAU150 starting monthly price	375 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 150,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
GAU150 evaluation profit target	9,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
GAU150 EOD drawdown distance	4,500 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
GAU150 maximum daily loss	3,300 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
GAU150 contract ceiling	15 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
GAU200 starting monthly price	550 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 200,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
GAU200 evaluation profit target	11,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
GAU200 EOD drawdown distance	6,000 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
GAU200 maximum daily loss	4,400 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
GAU200 contract ceiling	16 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
Evaluation billing cycle	30 days Renews until cancellation or passing. Failure and resetting are not cancellation; resetting does not move the billing date.	30 days Recurring billing until passing or cancellation. A separate reset does not move the billing date.
Evaluation trading days	No separate minimum-day rule; effectively at least four profitable days Consistency still applies alongside the profit target and loss rules.
Best-day contribution limit	30 % A single day must contribute less than 30% of total evaluation P&L. Exactly 30% does not qualify. A large day requires more total profit; this consistency rule does not apply to LiveSim or Live.
Non-professional LiveSim activation	139 USD/account One-time per-account charge deducted from the first profitable withdrawal. No upfront payment is not a fee waiver; the policy states it is not paid without a withdrawal.
Optional market depth	54 USD/month Market depth is separate from the standard data included in evaluation. Feed and platform compatibility are required.
Live data through Rithmic	140 USD/exchange/calendar-month Per exchange and calendar month; not prorated even for late-month activation. NinjaTrader data is priced separately.
Live data through NinjaTrader	156 USD/exchange/calendar-month Per exchange and calendar month; software, brokerage and transaction costs may be additional.
Minimum net withdrawal	100 USD Net minimum after applicable charges, subject to account and payment-provider conditions. It is not a first gross-request amount.
Profit-sharing scope	50% or 80% by withdrawal size; TCP400 has a 60/40 split Current policy uses a single withdrawal, not total account profit. Each tier has a different threshold; 80% is not universal.
Account type	Mixed — depends on the stage	Mixed — depends on the stage
25,000 evaluation profit target		1,500 USD Net profit target; the nominal tier is neither a participant deposit nor a withdrawable balance.
25,000 evaluation loss allowance		1,000 USD Trailing floor by account type, enforced during trading; EOD does not permit temporary breaches.
25,000 evaluation contract limit		2 minis / 20 micros Evaluation limit, not a promise of the same Funded Sim or Live limit. Product exceptions apply.
50,000 evaluation profit target		3,000 USD Net profit target; the nominal tier is neither a participant deposit nor a withdrawable balance.
50,000 evaluation loss allowance		2,000 USD Trailing floor by account type, enforced during trading; EOD does not permit temporary breaches.
50,000 evaluation contract limit		5 minis / 50 micros Evaluation limit, not a promise of the same Funded Sim or Live limit. Product exceptions apply.
100,000 evaluation profit target		6,000 USD Net profit target; the nominal tier is neither a participant deposit nor a withdrawable balance.
100,000 evaluation loss allowance		3,000 USD Trailing floor by account type, enforced during trading; EOD does not permit temporary breaches.
100,000 evaluation contract limit		10 minis / 50 micros Evaluation limit, not a promise of the same Funded Sim or Live limit. Product exceptions apply.
150,000 evaluation profit target		9,000 USD Net profit target; the nominal tier is neither a participant deposit nor a withdrawable balance.
150,000 evaluation loss allowance		4,500 USD Trailing floor by account type, enforced during trading; EOD does not permit temporary breaches.
150,000 evaluation contract limit		15 minis / 50 micros Evaluation limit, not a promise of the same Funded Sim or Live limit. Product exceptions apply.
Funded-stage activation fee		0 USD TradeDay removed the activation fee; trading commissions and Live data costs remain separate.
Quick Pay evaluation consistency		30 % Largest profitable day at most 30% of total profit; five evaluation trading days. Not a universal rule for every stage.
Fast Pass consistency		45 % Evaluation has a 45% rule. For Funded Sim accounts opened on or after 26 July 2026, the best profitable day is at most 45% of current profit plus prior payouts. Earlier accounts have no funded consistency rule under this policy.
Minimum Funded Sim payout request		250 USD Request amount before the profit split; the trader may receive less.
Fast Pass Funded Sim trader share		80 % For Funded Sim accounts opened on or after 26 July 2026; subject to profitable days, consistency against current profit plus prior payouts, caps and sufficient balance.
Professional Live market data		156 USD/month/exchange Per exchange at the Live stage; an existing personal subscription does not replace this charge.
ES/NQ commission example per side		2.88 USD/contract/side Table includes broker, NFA, clearing and exchange components; evaluation/Funded Sim charges are simulated. Live may differ.
MES/MNQ commission example per side		0.95 USD/contract/side Per-side commission, not a round-turn total. Subject to product and stage.

Platforms	NinjaTrader / Finamark / R \| Trader Pro / Tradovate / TradingView / Quantower	Tradovate / NinjaTrader / TradingView / R\|Trader Pro / Quantower / ATAS / Bookmap / Jigsaw / Sierra Chart / MotiveWave
Currencies	USD	USD
Check with the provider	Visit Earn2Trade · Opens in a new tab	Visit TradeDay · Opens in a new tab Coupon code at checkout

Service and entity
Earn2Trade	TradeDay
Service type
Funded trading	Funded trading
Legal entity and jurisdiction
Earn2Trade, LLC · United States — root-site terms / Bahia Education Services L.L.C · United Arab Emirates — Non-US education and regional reseller terms	TradeDay LLC · Illinois, United States

Evaluation terms
Earn2Trade	TradeDay
Evaluation stages
1	1

Loss limits
Earn2Trade	TradeDay
Drawdown method
Trailing	Trailing

Payout rules
Earn2Trade	TradeDay
Payout conditions
The split depends on single-withdrawal size and account tier; LiveSim ceilings are cumulative and Live progression is conditional.	Quick Pay and Fast Pass differ in splits, consistency, days, caps and the floor after payouts. Live is a separate conditional stage.

Resets and extra fees
Earn2Trade	TradeDay
Trading restrictions
Session, loss, contract-ladder, copying and instrument restrictions vary by programme and stage.	Close positions and orders before the daily close; news, contract and product limits depend on stage.

Costs and service terms
Earn2Trade	TradeDay
Service model
Futures trading evaluation The evaluation is simulated; passing may lead to a simulated LiveSim or Live offer subject to the partner and review.	Futures trading evaluation Evaluation and Funded Sim are simulated; progression to Funded Live is separate and conditional.
TCP25 starting monthly price
150 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 25,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
TCP25 evaluation profit target
1,750 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
TCP25 EOD drawdown distance
1,500 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
TCP25 maximum daily loss
550 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
TCP25 contract ceiling
3 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
TCP50 starting monthly price
190 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 50,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
TCP50 evaluation profit target
3,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
TCP50 EOD drawdown distance
2,000 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
TCP50 maximum daily loss
1,100 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
TCP50 contract ceiling
6 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
TCP100 starting monthly price
350 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 100,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
TCP100 evaluation profit target
6,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
TCP100 EOD drawdown distance
3,500 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
TCP100 maximum daily loss
2,200 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
TCP100 contract ceiling
12 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
GAU50 starting monthly price
170 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 50,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
GAU50 evaluation profit target
3,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
GAU50 EOD drawdown distance
2,000 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
GAU50 maximum daily loss
1,100 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
GAU50 contract ceiling
6 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
GAU100 starting monthly price
315 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 100,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
GAU100 evaluation profit target
6,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
GAU100 EOD drawdown distance
3,500 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
GAU100 maximum daily loss
2,200 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
GAU100 contract ceiling
12 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
GAU150 starting monthly price
375 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 150,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
GAU150 evaluation profit target
9,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
GAU150 EOD drawdown distance
4,500 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
GAU150 maximum daily loss
3,300 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
GAU150 contract ceiling
15 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
GAU200 starting monthly price
550 USD/month Starting price on the Non-US programme card, before a promotion or individual charge; the subscription renews every 30 days. 200,000 is a simulated account parameter, not a withdrawable amount.
GAU200 evaluation profit target
11,000 USD Simulated evaluation target; meeting it does not automatically approve funding or a withdrawal.
GAU200 EOD drawdown distance
6,000 USD The floor rises under the end-of-day mechanism and does not fall after a loss. Open losses can breach it intraday.
GAU200 maximum daily loss
4,400 USD Includes open and closed P&L and commissions during the programme-defined trading day.
GAU200 contract ceiling
16 contracts Subject to the progression ladder and real-time balance; the ceiling is not an immediate starting allowance. Micro conversion applies only to specified instruments.
Evaluation billing cycle
30 days Renews until cancellation or passing. Failure and resetting are not cancellation; resetting does not move the billing date.	30 days Recurring billing until passing or cancellation. A separate reset does not move the billing date.
Evaluation trading days
No separate minimum-day rule; effectively at least four profitable days Consistency still applies alongside the profit target and loss rules.
Best-day contribution limit
30 % A single day must contribute less than 30% of total evaluation P&L. Exactly 30% does not qualify. A large day requires more total profit; this consistency rule does not apply to LiveSim or Live.
Non-professional LiveSim activation
139 USD/account One-time per-account charge deducted from the first profitable withdrawal. No upfront payment is not a fee waiver; the policy states it is not paid without a withdrawal.
Optional market depth
54 USD/month Market depth is separate from the standard data included in evaluation. Feed and platform compatibility are required.
Live data through Rithmic
140 USD/exchange/calendar-month Per exchange and calendar month; not prorated even for late-month activation. NinjaTrader data is priced separately.
Live data through NinjaTrader
156 USD/exchange/calendar-month Per exchange and calendar month; software, brokerage and transaction costs may be additional.
Minimum net withdrawal
100 USD Net minimum after applicable charges, subject to account and payment-provider conditions. It is not a first gross-request amount.
Profit-sharing scope
50% or 80% by withdrawal size; TCP400 has a 60/40 split Current policy uses a single withdrawal, not total account profit. Each tier has a different threshold; 80% is not universal.
Account type
Mixed — depends on the stage	Mixed — depends on the stage
25,000 evaluation profit target
	1,500 USD Net profit target; the nominal tier is neither a participant deposit nor a withdrawable balance.
25,000 evaluation loss allowance
	1,000 USD Trailing floor by account type, enforced during trading; EOD does not permit temporary breaches.
25,000 evaluation contract limit
	2 minis / 20 micros Evaluation limit, not a promise of the same Funded Sim or Live limit. Product exceptions apply.
50,000 evaluation profit target
	3,000 USD Net profit target; the nominal tier is neither a participant deposit nor a withdrawable balance.
50,000 evaluation loss allowance
	2,000 USD Trailing floor by account type, enforced during trading; EOD does not permit temporary breaches.
50,000 evaluation contract limit
	5 minis / 50 micros Evaluation limit, not a promise of the same Funded Sim or Live limit. Product exceptions apply.
100,000 evaluation profit target
	6,000 USD Net profit target; the nominal tier is neither a participant deposit nor a withdrawable balance.
100,000 evaluation loss allowance
	3,000 USD Trailing floor by account type, enforced during trading; EOD does not permit temporary breaches.
100,000 evaluation contract limit
	10 minis / 50 micros Evaluation limit, not a promise of the same Funded Sim or Live limit. Product exceptions apply.
150,000 evaluation profit target
	9,000 USD Net profit target; the nominal tier is neither a participant deposit nor a withdrawable balance.
150,000 evaluation loss allowance
	4,500 USD Trailing floor by account type, enforced during trading; EOD does not permit temporary breaches.
150,000 evaluation contract limit
	15 minis / 50 micros Evaluation limit, not a promise of the same Funded Sim or Live limit. Product exceptions apply.
Funded-stage activation fee
	0 USD TradeDay removed the activation fee; trading commissions and Live data costs remain separate.
Quick Pay evaluation consistency
	30 % Largest profitable day at most 30% of total profit; five evaluation trading days. Not a universal rule for every stage.
Fast Pass consistency
	45 % Evaluation has a 45% rule. For Funded Sim accounts opened on or after 26 July 2026, the best profitable day is at most 45% of current profit plus prior payouts. Earlier accounts have no funded consistency rule under this policy.
Minimum Funded Sim payout request
	250 USD Request amount before the profit split; the trader may receive less.
Fast Pass Funded Sim trader share
	80 % For Funded Sim accounts opened on or after 26 July 2026; subject to profitable days, consistency against current profit plus prior payouts, caps and sufficient balance.
Professional Live market data
	156 USD/month/exchange Per exchange at the Live stage; an existing personal subscription does not replace this charge.
ES/NQ commission example per side
	2.88 USD/contract/side Table includes broker, NFA, clearing and exchange components; evaluation/Funded Sim charges are simulated. Live may differ.
MES/MNQ commission example per side
	0.95 USD/contract/side Per-side commission, not a round-turn total. Subject to product and stage.

Access and currencies
Earn2Trade	TradeDay
Platforms
NinjaTrader / Finamark / R \| Trader Pro / Tradovate / TradingView / Quantower	Tradovate / NinjaTrader / TradingView / R\|Trader Pro / Quantower / ATAS / Bookmap / Jigsaw / Sierra Chart / MotiveWave
Currencies
USD	USD

Check with the provider

Earn2Trade

Visit Earn2Trade

TradeDay

Visit TradeDay

Coupon code at checkout

Read our editorial comparisons

Editorial comparison

3Commas vs Coinrule: crypto bot cycles, rules and exposure

Compare the current 3Commas v2 route with Coinrule by bot structure, allocations, repeat limits and exits. Includes exposure examples and exchange-connection checks.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

ATAS pricing: Start, Plus, Pro and Ultra compared, including trial terms

Compare licence prices, tool limits and live-data connection permissions. See what each ATAS plan includes, how to stop the trial, and which data and trading costs need a separate budget.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

ATAS vs NinjaTrader: footprint, data and a futures account

ATAS provides an analytical environment with external connections; NinjaTrader combines software and futures brokerage. Compare volume classification, depth, tool entitlements, practice and separate costs.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

ATAS vs TrendSpider: order-flow analysis or trading-rule tests

Compare trade and DOM observation with visual rules, backtests and alerts, including input requirements, fill assumptions, plan limits and separate costs.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Bitget vs Bybit: Fees, Orders and Withdrawals for the Same Trade

Compare the product, execution role and transfer route. Work through equal-notional futures fees, conflicting spot figures and checks that can change the total cost.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Bitget vs KCEX: spot and futures fees for the same trade

KCEX publishes lower execution fees, but the comparison depends on the product, account rate and fill price. Separate trading fees from funding and withdrawals.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Bitget vs MEXC: Comparing the Same Trade on the Website and API

Compare the same contract by account and trading channel. A maker-entry/taker-exit example shows how MEXC's API schedule changes the result and what to add before withdrawing.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Bookmap vs ATAS: liquidity heatmaps, footprint charts and costs

A practical comparison of Bookmap liquidity analysis and ATAS volume analysis: current plans, live and delayed data, replay, execution connections and choosing a workflow.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Bookmap vs TradingView: order books, charts and market data

Bookmap focuses on liquidity and executions over time; TradingView offers charts, alerts and scripts. Compare the data type, volume calculation and role of each application.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Charles Schwab vs Fidelity: investing and stock trading

When stock base commission is zero, assess account scope, securities, fractions, trading tools, service charges and portfolio portability before choosing.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Coinbase vs Bitget: buying, trading and withdrawals

Compare the asset delivered rather than one fee. Evaluate Coinbase and Bitget purchase routes, withdrawal holds, account pricing and network checks.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Coinbase vs Bybit: services, fees and crypto custody

An exchange account, simple buying and derivatives are distinct services. Compare Coinbase and Bybit by permissions, executed value, funding and asset exit.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Coinbase vs KCEX: accounts, spot and derivatives

Check account permissions and the final outcome: simple purchasing, spot or a contract. Compare Coinbase and KCEX by net cost, withdrawal conditions and risk.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Coinbase vs MEXC: buying and trading costs by product

Total budget, trade value and execution commission are different inputs. Compare a Coinbase quote with the appropriate MEXC route, including pair, MX and API exceptions.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Coinrule vs TradersPost: rules, signals and the execution account

Compare account connections, native rules and external signals, quantity and existing holdings. Includes a stock-sizing exercise and checks for capacity and cost.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Account security at Kraken, Coinbase and Bitget: login, withdrawals and recovery

Compare controls by purpose: authenticating login, changing settings, withdrawal destinations and recovering access. A documented feature is neither a safety rating nor a custody guarantee.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

API permissions at Bybit, Bitget and MEXC: read, trade and withdraw

An API key must match its task and API family. Compare permissions, IP restrictions and account scope, separating data records from trading and asset-transfer capabilities.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

KCEX, MEXC or Bybit? Crypto Exchanges for Israeli Residents

Compare KCEX, MEXC and Bybit for Israeli residents: spot and futures fees, discounts, deposit routes and service restrictions to check before opening an account.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Limit orders at Kraken, Coinbase and Bybit: price, fills and fees

A limit constrains the fill price but guarantees neither a fill nor maker fees. Compare order-book behavior, Post-Only and time in force before relying on the entered price.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Earn2Trade vs FTMO CFD: Products, Costs and Evaluation Rules

Earn2Trade futures versus FTMO Challenge 1-Step and 2-Step CFDs: billing cycles, loss limits, consistency and reward conditions.

Updated: Oct 21, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Earn2Trade vs TradeDay: Futures, Loss Floors and Withdrawal Conditions

Compare TCP and Gauntlet Mini with Quick Pay and Fast Pass: consistency, recurring billing, post-evaluation progression and account-specific profit shares.

Updated: Oct 21, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Eightcap vs OANDA: platforms, accounts and forex fees

Check TradingView and MetaTrader connections, normalize commission units and identify the contracting company for international Eightcap and OANDA US forex.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Eightcap vs RoboForex: Raw, Prime and trade size

Raw per-lot versus Prime turnover pricing, ProCent units, platforms and margin terms: a comparison separating costs, execution and risk.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FP Markets Standard vs Raw: Comparing Spreads and Commission

For EUR/USD in a USD account, Raw’s $6 round-trip commission per lot equals 0.6 pips. Examples at one lot and one tenth of a lot show when a spread saving covers it, alongside currency and platform rates.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FP Markets vs Eightcap: costs, platforms and your contracting entity

Raw forex in a USD account: round-trip commission per lot is $6 at FP Markets on MT4/MT5 versus $7 at Eightcap under its international table. A $1 difference can be offset by spread; TradingView connections, cTrader and the contracting entity complete the decision.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FP Markets vs OANDA: forex accounts and trade costs

Compare international FP Markets accounts with OANDA US forex: commission units, platform connections, financing and the contracting company’s terms.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FP Markets vs RoboForex: fees, accounts and software

Raw per-lot pricing versus Prime USD-turnover pricing: compare tariffs, billing timing, platform compatibility and permissions with a scoped worked example.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FTMO 1-Step vs 2-Step: Loss Rules and Rewards

Choose between FTMO 1-Step and 2-Step using daily and static or trailing loss limits, the Consistency or Best Day rule based on the order or merge date, Standard and Swing accounts, and evaluation fee refunds.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FTMO vs FundedNext: CFD programmes, loss limits and rewards

Compare FTMO Challenge and Stellar by evaluation stages, loss limits, platforms and reward timing. Check how a programme fits your workflow before paying.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FTMO CFD vs Topstep: evaluation versus a futures programme

Compare FTMO CFD with Topstep Trading Combine by market, loss allowance, trading hours and programme progression. Simulated buying power is not a cash balance.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FundedNext Futures vs Topstep: evaluation, loss limits and rewards

Compare futures Flex with standard Trading Combine: targets, trailing floors, billing, qualifying days and rewards. Stellar CFD terms are kept outside this comparison.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

NinjaTrader, ATAS and Bookmap: execution, volume and liquidity

Separate execution accounts, trade data and the order book. Examine each tool's role, required permissions and a futures workspace without assuming automatic integration.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FxPro vs FP Markets: Raw, cTrader and TradingView Costs Explained

Compare Standard and Raw pricing, USD-notional versus lot-based commission, platforms, holding costs and practical workflows.

Updated: Oct 20, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

FxPro vs HFM: Platforms, Accounts and Comparable Commission Units

Compare CFD accounts, TradingView connections, cTrader versus HFM Zero costs, overnight funding and entity-specific conditions.

Updated: Oct 20, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

HFM vs Eightcap: trading workflow, Raw commissions and a cost example

Manage orders in HFM WebTrader or connect an Eightcap account to TradingView? A practical comparison of account choices, commission for 0.10 lot and an example separating commission from spread.

Updated: Oct 20, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

HFM vs FP Markets: accounts, costs and the TradingView connection

Compare HFM Zero, Premium and Pro with FP Markets Standard and Raw: commissions on the same basis, a complete cost example and platform choices that fit your workflow.

Updated: Oct 20, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

IBKR vs Charles Schwab: markets and international accounts

US shares versus a portfolio across markets: compare IBKR and Schwab International plans, execution channels, currencies and portfolio transfers.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

IBKR vs Fidelity: products, fees and account scope

Compare an appropriate US account with a multi-currency portfolio workflow: opening restrictions, stock pricing, foreign trading, recurring purchases and fractional-share limitations.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

IBKR vs Saxo: trading, currency conversion and custody

Compare IBKR and Saxo by security, currency and account terms: trading fees, manual and automatic conversion, custody and stock lending.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Interactive Israel vs direct Interactive Brokers: service, fees and tax administration

Compare the intermediary and Hebrew-service arrangement with direct IBKR: asset custody, defined commission examples and separate HYBRID withholding enrollment.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

KCEX vs Bybit: comparing fees and terms

KCEX and Bybit compared: spot and futures fees, Bybit options, VIP 0 rates and crypto transfer costs.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

KCEX vs MEXC: comparing fees and terms

KCEX and MEXC compared: spot and futures fees, conditional MX discounts and withdrawals by coin, network and verification level.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Koinly vs CoinLedger: missing transactions, reports and professional handover

Compare Koinly and CoinLedger on calculation completeness, skipped transactions, imports and report-year costs. Check the evidence before purchase and handover.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Koinly vs CoinTracking: multi-year records, capacity and migration costs

Compare Koinly and CoinTracking for several years of crypto records: report-year purchases, subscription capacity, transfer checks and preserving migration corrections.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Koinly vs Bybit, Bitget and Coinbase exports: consolidation and record checks

An exchange file records activity at that provider; Koinly can combine sources and calculate from the data. Check coverage, transfers and duplicates before handing over reports.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Kraken vs Bitget: products, orders and deposits

Map the route from funding to execution and withdrawal, separate spot from derivatives, and check Bitget account pricing against public product data.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Kraken vs Bybit: spot, derivatives and execution costs

Define the product before comparing spot holdings with a derivative. Examine Kraken and Bybit trading fees, execution and funding using equal-notional examples.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Kraken vs Coinbase: simple buys and advanced trading

Compare quoted purchases with order-book trading, then add funding, withdrawals and custody. Evaluate Kraken and Coinbase using the same transaction.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Kraken vs KCEX: fees, products and account workflow

Separate zero trading commission from buying and withdrawal costs. Compare Kraken Pro and KCEX using execution price, funding, networks and exit workflow.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Kraken vs MEXC: fee schedules, products and transfers

A zero maker fee does not settle the comparison. Check the pair, order channel and funding route, including savings versus additional transfer costs.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Ledger and Koinly: controlling keys and reviewing transaction history

Ledger signs transactions and protects keys; Koinly consolidates data for reconciliation and reports. Combining them requires public addresses, complete history and checks before export.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Ledger hardware wallets compared: Nano S Plus, Nano X, Nano Gen5, Flex and Stax

Compare all five Ledger models by phone and desktop connectivity, transaction readability and backup options to choose a device that fits how you use crypto.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Ledger vs Coinbase Wallet: signing, app connections and recovery

The choice depends on who signs and how access is recovered. Coinbase documents several wallet types and a Ledger connection to the Base extension; these differ from its exchange account.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Ledger vs Exchange Custody: Key Control and Recovering Access

A worksheet comparing Ledger self-custody with an exchange balance: key control, recovery after a failure, trading access and the cost of returning funds.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

MEXC vs Binance: spot fees, futures and the withdrawal route

Compare a defined transaction: standard spot schedules, BTCUSDT futures on web and app, API pricing, funding and wallet transfers. Worked costs and account checks for a practical comparison.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

MEXC vs Bybit: fees and products compared

MEXC and Bybit compared: base-tier spot and futures fees, the MX discount, VIP tiers and identity checks before depositing.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

MT4 vs MT5 vs cTrader: what changes in everyday trading

Compare orders, automation and migration across MT4, MT5 and cTrader, with a netting-versus-hedging example and a clear separation of software features from broker terms.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

NinjaTrader vs Plus500 Futures: accounts, software and contract costs

Compare NinjaTrader Clearing pricing with the US Plus500 Futures offering only. Assess per-side commissions, plan fees, data and withdrawals without importing Plus500 CFD terms.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

NinjaTrader vs Topstep: futures brokerage or an evaluation programme

Compare service roles, capital, margins, programme limits and operating costs. A NinjaTrader Clearing account and Combine are different account arrangements.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Options at IBKR, Schwab and Fidelity: permissions and tools

Compare options by contract, approval and workflow: per-contract fees and minimums, scenario analysis, multi-leg orders, expiration and assignment.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Plus500 vs Eightcap: CFD accounts, costs and conversion

Plus500EE spread pricing versus Eightcap Standard and Raw: platforms, round-trip costs, financing and net profit/loss conversion with worked scenarios.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Plus500 vs FP Markets: CFDs, platforms and exit orders

Plus500EE spread-based CFDs versus FP’s global Standard and Raw accounts: platforms, supported guaranteed stops and holding costs.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Plus500 vs Interactive Brokers: CFDs or buying shares?

Compare Plus500 CFDs with direct share and ETF purchases through IBKR: ownership, equal-exposure costs, funding, currency conversion and account terms.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Plus500 vs OANDA: products, platforms and financing

Plus500EE CFDs versus OANDA US forex: identify the contract, compare financing in consistent units and distinguish spread, conversion and account costs.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Evaluation costs at FTMO, FundedNext and Topstep: programmes and billing

One-time challenges versus subscriptions, activation, resets and conditional refunds. Budget calculations for specified programmes without assuming a pass, discount or account acceptance.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Payout rules at FTMO, FundedNext and Topstep: stages and checks

When rewards can be requested, which profits count, how caps and splits affect money received, and what changes afterward. Every figure is tied to its programme and cohort.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Recurring buys at Kraken and Coinbase: timing, price and cash flow

Kraken offers recurring-order management in its app; Coinbase executes a purchase at setup and requires a new schedule to change amount or frequency. Compare every charge.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

RoboForex vs Exness: accounts, commission units and forex trade costs

Compare RoboForex Pro, Prime and ECN with Exness Standard and Raw Spread using scoped fees and EUR/USD examples.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

RoboForex vs OANDA: products, units and forex accounts

Compare Belize’s RoboForex Ltd with US OANDA Corporation: accounts, lots versus USD turnover, commission timing and the distinction between costs and risk.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Saxo vs Charles Schwab: markets, currency and custody

How to compare a long-term portfolio at Saxo and Schwab International: security and venue, settlement currency, holding charges, stock lending and order channel.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Saxo vs Fidelity: choosing a broker by market and account

A US portfolio in an appropriate account versus additional markets and currencies: opening conditions, foreign trading, conversion, custody and investing tools.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

Foreign-currency portfolio costs: IBKR, Saxo and Schwab

Calculate orders, conversion, custody and exit separately: monthly funding, conversion minimums, holding-day charges and currency risk.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradeDay vs FTMO: Futures, CFDs and Evaluation Costs Over Time

Compare TradeDay Quick Pay and Fast Pass with FTMO CFD products: loss floors, recurring versus one-time costs and reward conditions.

Updated: Oct 20, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradeDay vs FundedNext: Futures Evaluation versus Stellar CFDs

Compare markets, loss floors, evaluation renewals, reward cycles and platforms at TradeDay and FundedNext Stellar CFD products.

Updated: Oct 20, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradersPost vs 3Commas: compare the current v2 route

Compare TradersPost signal routing with the 3Commas v2 route built with WunderTrading, including account scope, costs, permissions, migration checks and exits.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradersPost vs Capitalise.ai: signals, rule writing and account access

Compare external signal routing with plain-English strategy creation, check current Capitalise.ai onboarding routes, and plan testing, costs, monitoring and shutdown.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradersPost vs PineConnector: broker routing, MT5 and total cost

Compare TradersPost cloud routing with PineConnector execution through MetaTrader, including hosted Edge, account setup, position sizing, monitoring and an orderly exit.

Updated: Oct 16, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradersPost vs TraderSync: order routing versus reviewing trades

TradersPost routes signals to a connected account; TraderSync consolidates records and analysis. Compare the signal chain, execution permissions, fill reconciliation and subscription needs at each stage.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradersPost vs TradingView: from chart alert to account order

TradingView defines conditions and alerts; TradersPost processes signals and routes instructions. Compare messages, symbols, signal prices, broker status and checks before live execution.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TraderSync vs Edgewonk: trade replay or behaviour and management review

Compare journals by imports, decision records, exit analysis and missed trades. Understand historical Market Replay versus statistical simulation and choose around a repeatable review.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TraderSync vs Koinly: a trading journal or consolidated crypto records

TraderSync analyses decisions and trades; Koinly consolidates crypto history and reports by tax year. Compare execution grouping, transfers, acquisition history, exports and professional preparation.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TraderSync vs TradeZella: from imported trades to review and practice

Compare imports, execution grouping, strategy rules, replay and mentor feedback. Choose a journal and plan around the review work you need to finish after trading.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TraderSync vs TradingView: executed trades versus chart analysis

TraderSync consolidates trade records and analysis; TradingView helps examine charts, conditions and strategies. Compare imports, partial fills, practice and the link between decisions and outcomes.

Updated: Oct 14, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradeStation vs Interactive Brokers: Accounts, Software and Trading Costs

Compare TradeStation Securities, Global and direct IBKR by account structure, permissions, software, market data and the cost components of the same activity.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradingView vs ATAS: charts, footprints and market data

Choose between TradingView and ATAS around chart analysis, footprints and automation, and check whether both screens use the same instrument and data.

Updated: Oct 15, 2026Read article

Editorial comparison

TradingView vs Koyfin: charts, alerts and company research

Compare chart monitoring with financial statements, estimates and peer research, including data timing, exports, alerts and separate costs.

Updated: Oct 17, 2026Read article

Your comparison selection

▾ Service and entity

▾ Evaluation terms

▾ Loss limits

▾ Payout rules

▾ Resets and extra fees

▾ Costs and service terms

▾ Access and currencies

Check with the provider

Earn2Trade

TradeDay

Read our editorial comparisons

Your privacy choices